Recommendation
SeaDeal evaluates foam thickness, dielectric constant, tank geometry and whether probe contact is acceptable before recommending a level device.
Comparison table
| Criteria | Recommended option | Alternative option |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy foam | Guided wave radar may be preferred if probe installation is possible. | Ultrasonic often struggles with foam. |
| Light foam | 80 GHz radar can be evaluated. | Mounting and echo settings still matter. |
| Contact risk | Non-contact radar avoids probe buildup. | Guided wave probe needs material and cleaning review. |
Application scenarios
Foam weakens level signals, creates unstable echoes and can cause ultrasonic sensors or simple radar settings to fail.
Problem summary: Foam weakens level signals, creates unstable echoes and can cause ultrasonic sensors or simple radar settings to fail.
Related product categories
- Level Measurement — Radar level meters, ultrasonic level meters, magnetic level gauges, float switches and hydrostatic transmitters for tank and silo monitoring.
Selection guide
- Describe foam thickness and frequency.
- Confirm medium dielectric and tank height.
- Check whether a probe can be installed and maintained.
- Send tank photo and nozzle information.
Data to send for a fast quote
- Foam condition
- Medium
- Tank height
- Nozzle
- Probe feasibility
- Temperature
Frequently asked questions
What level sensor works best with foam?
Guided wave radar is often evaluated for heavy foam when a probe can be installed; 80 GHz radar may work with lighter foam.
Does ultrasonic level measurement work with foam?
It is usually less reliable because foam can absorb or scatter sound waves.